Variations in natural history museums in the central United States /

This study documents and explores variation in a sample of natural history-oriented institutions. A population of 192 natural history-oriented institutions in the Central United States was sampled and stratified according to governance structure (university, private, public, federal). Eight-five per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cato, Paisley S.
Other Authors: McNamara, James F. (degree committee member.), Slack, R. Douglas (degree committee member.), Steele, D. Gentry (degree committee member.)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: 1990.
Subjects:
Online Access:Link to OAKTrust copy

MARC

LEADER 00000ctm a2200000Ia 4500
001 in00000990033
005 20200904152502.0
008 910312s1990 xx a bm 000 0 eng d
035 |a (OCoLC)ocm23233979 
035 |9 AEY9162AM 
040 |a TXA  |b eng  |c TXA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d UMI  |d OCLCF  |d TXA 
035 |a (OCoLC)23233979 
043 |a n-usc-- 
049 |a TXAM 
099 |a 1990  |a Dissertation  |a C366 
100 1 |a Cato, Paisley S. 
245 1 0 |a Variations in natural history museums in the central United States /  |c by Paisley Seyfarth Cato. 
264 1 |c 1990. 
300 |a viii, 210 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 29 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Typescript (photocopy). 
502 |b Ph. D.  |c Texas A & M University  |d 1990 
500 |a Vita. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
500 |a "Major subject: Wildlife & fisheries sciences." 
520 3 |a This study documents and explores variation in a sample of natural history-oriented institutions. A population of 192 natural history-oriented institutions in the Central United States was sampled and stratified according to governance structure (university, private, public, federal). Eight-five percent (93) responded to a questionnaire designed to document institutional characteristics relative to the purpose, disciplinary focus, collections, size, and audience. The data suggest that the way an organization perceives itself affects its institutional characteristics. Approximately two-thirds of the institutions described their organizations as museums; the other one-third preferred alternative designations. None of the federally-governed institutions selected museum as a descriptor. The museums were distinguished from non-museums in the sample by a difference in purpose and focus, the number of kinds of collections, the frequency with which the collections were useful for research and the size of the institution. Responses from the fifty-eight museums were analyzed to determine the affect of governance structure on the institutional characteristics. Not only was variation documented among governance structures but within each governance type as well. Descriptions of the university, public and private museums were developed. Among the factors suggested that might explain the intrastratum variation was the disciplinary focus of the institution. Data indicate that there is not a single operational definition of natural history among the museums in the sample. This was evident by the variation in disciplinary foci reported by the institutions, the variation in types of collections maintained, and a comparison between the terms natural history and natural science. The variation in operational definitions was described and discussed relative to how the definition of natural history has evolved. The findings are discussed relative to the development of standardized categories and a taxonomy of museums. Future directions for research are proposed. 
650 0 |a Natural history museums  |z Middle West  |x Management. 
650 0 |a Museums  |x History. 
650 0 |a Museums  |x Evaluation. 
650 7 |a Museums.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01030128 
650 7 |a Museums  |x Evaluation.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01030166 
651 7 |a Middle West.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01240052 
650 4 |a Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences 
655 7 |a History.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Jones, Clyde,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a Schmidly, David J.,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a McNamara, James F.,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Slack, R. Douglas,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Steele, D. Gentry,  |e degree committee member. 
710 2 |a Texas A & M University,  |e degree granting institution. 
856 4 1 |x http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1118144  |z Link to OAKTrust copy  |t 0 
856 4 1 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=744838721&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=2945&RQT=309&VName=PQD  |z Link to OAKTrust copy 
994 |a C0  |b TXA 
999 f f |s 0e55f0d0-da84-361c-bcc5-129847a73668  |i 766d921a-5a7d-343b-b417-033cb034d59c  |t 0 
952 f f |p noncirc  |a Texas A&M University  |b J.J. Pickle Campus  |c High Density Repository  |d Remote Storage  |t 0  |e 1990 Dissertation C366  |h Other scheme  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14839611518 
998 f f |a 1990 Dissertation C366  |t 0  |l Remote Storage 
998 f f |a 1990 Dissertation C366  |t 0  |l Available Online