An agricultural sector analysis of the United States sugar import policy /

The United States has maintained a sugar import quota since 1982. This policy, while supporting U.S. producer prices and incomes at a high level, has caused consumers to pay more for sugar and has reduced the incomes of foreign sugar producers. It has also stimulated domestic sugar production along...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tanyeri-Abur, Aysen
Other Authors: Baye, Michael (degree committee member.), Cheng-Chang, Ching (degree committee member.), Knutson, Ronald (degree committee member.), Peterson, E. Wesley F. (degree committee member.)
Format: Thesis Book
Language:English
Published: 1990.
Subjects:
Online Access:ProQuest, Abstract
Link to OAKTrust copy

MARC

LEADER 00000ctm a2200000Ia 4500
001 in00000998245
005 20200904152535.0
008 910115s1990 xx a bm 000 0 eng d
035 |a (OCoLC)ocm22965035 
035 |9 AEY7894AM 
040 |a TXA  |b eng  |c TXA  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d UMI  |d TXA 
035 |a (OCoLC)22965035 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a TXAM 
099 |a 1990  |a Dissertation  |a T169 
100 1 |a Tanyeri-Abur, Aysen. 
245 1 3 |a An agricultural sector analysis of the United States sugar import policy / 
264 1 |c 1990. 
300 |a x, 119 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 29 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Typescript (photocopy). 
502 |b Ph. D.  |c Texas A & M University  |d 1990 
500 |a Vita. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
500 |a "Major subject: Agricultural economics." 
520 3 |a The United States has maintained a sugar import quota since 1982. This policy, while supporting U.S. producer prices and incomes at a high level, has caused consumers to pay more for sugar and has reduced the incomes of foreign sugar producers. It has also stimulated domestic sugar production along with development of sugar substitutes such as High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) which contributed to the fall in sugar demand. The quota policy has been criticized by previous economic studies and in the GATT trade negotiations. This study extends previous analyses to look at effects of sugar policy changes from a total sector perspective. The study of potential sugar policy reform was done using a mathematical programming sector model. Substitution between HFCS and sugar in sweetener using industries was explicitly modeled. A baseline scenario was constructed and validated using 1986 data which was then compared to alternative policy runs where: (i) the sugar quota was removed, and (ii) a target price was implemented. Comparisons were made with and without farm program provisions for the other sectoral commodities. The results show differing implications in the sugar industry as compared to the agricultural sector. Quota removal raised the welfare of domestic sugar consumers and foreign sugar producers but resulted in a lower welfare level for domestic sugar producers. Welfare for the rest of the society increases with the removal of the quota only if distortions arising from farm programs are eliminated. In the farm program runs, both the removal of the quota and the imposition of target prices resulted in a lower net social welfare compared to the case with the quota. Acreage substitutions towards other crops result in a social welfare loss because of increased government payments. This result provides an empirical example of the theory of the second best as the costs of other distortions outweigh the sugar gains. However, when farm programs for the other crops are eliminated, quota removal results in an increase in net social benefit. 
650 0 |a Sugar trade  |x Government policy  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Sugar trade  |x Mathematical models. 
650 0 |a Import quotas. 
650 7 |a Sugar trade  |x Government policy.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01137440 
651 7 |a United States.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 
650 4 |a Major agricultural economics. 
655 7 |a Academic theses  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a McCarl, Bruce A.,  |e degree supervisor. 
700 1 |a Baye, Michael,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Cheng-Chang, Ching,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Knutson, Ronald,  |e degree committee member. 
700 1 |a Peterson, E. Wesley F.,  |e degree committee member. 
710 2 |a Texas A & M University,  |e degree granting institution. 
856 4 2 |3 ProQuest, Abstract  |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9027280  |t 0 
856 4 1 |x http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/DISSERTATIONS-1117111  |z Link to OAKTrust copy 
856 4 1 |u http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=747120021&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=2945&RQT=309&VName=PQD  |z Link to OAKTrust copy 
994 |a C0  |b TXA 
999 f f |s 345f8a7f-1c85-3036-bd8a-377ce581061c  |i fe75167e-46fb-3259-ae16-832207de48f9  |t 0 
952 f f |p noncirc  |a Texas A&M University  |b J.J. Pickle Campus  |c High Density Repository  |d Remote Storage  |t 0  |e 1990 Dissertation T169  |h Other scheme  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14841028064 
998 f f |a 1990 Dissertation T169  |t 0  |l Available Online 
998 f f |a 1990 Dissertation T169  |t 0  |l Remote Storage