Future roles of U.S. nuclear forces : implications for U.S. strategy /

Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has reexamined its basic assumptions about foreign policy and instruments of national security policy. This study examines the possible roles of nuclear weapons in contemporary U.S. national security policy.

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: United States. Air Force
Other Authors: Buchan, Glenn C.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA : Rand Project Air Force, 2003.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 in00001828861
005 20151026054826.0
008 000918s2003 caua b 000 0 eng
010 |a  00045817  
020 |a 0833029177 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocm45059077 
040 |a DLC  |c DLC  |d OCLCQ  |d C#P  |d XY4  |d TXA  |d UtOrBLW 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a TXAM 
050 0 0 |a UA23  |b .F883 2003 
082 0 0 |a 355.02/17/0973  |2 21 
245 0 0 |a Future roles of U.S. nuclear forces :  |b implications for U.S. strategy /  |c Glenn C. Buchan [and others]. 
246 3 |a Future roles of United States nuclear forces 
264 1 |a Santa Monica, CA :  |b Rand Project Air Force,  |c 2003. 
300 |a xxiv, 128 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 23 cm. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 121-128). 
500 |a "Prepared for the United States Air Force." 
500 |a "MR-1231-AF"--P. [4] of cover. 
520 |a Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has reexamined its basic assumptions about foreign policy and instruments of national security policy. This study examines the possible roles of nuclear weapons in contemporary U.S. national security policy. 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Nuclear weapons and U.S. security, back to basics: What nuclear weapons do -- Risks and disadvantages of nuclear weapons -- Historical legacy -- Contemporary roles for U.S. nuclear weapons: New security environment -- Future nuclear threats -- Other kinds of threats -- U.S. national security policy; a spectrum of possibilities -- Abstinence -- Defense -- Counterforce and countermilitary operations -- Deterrence and coercion -- Potential roles for U.S. nuclear weapons -- Terror weapons/traditional deterrence -- Counterforce -- Special targets -- Critical military situations -- Stressing cases; some contemporary comparisons between nuclear and conventional weapons: Strategic nuclear weapons in halting invading armies -- Halting an army; nuclear weapons -- Halting an army; smart/brilliant weapons -- Halting an army; collateral damage possibilities -- Halting an army; pros and cons of nuclear versus conventional weapons -- Strategic nuclear weapons in destroying hardened bunkers containing WMD -- Destroying bunkers; nuclear weapons -- Destroying bunkers; conventional precision-guided weapons -- Destroying bunkers; advantages and disadvantages of nuclear and conventional weapons -- Destroying bunkers; "new" weapons? -- Strategic nuclear weapons in destroying a deeply buried command and control facility -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; earth-penetrating conventional weapons -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; nuclear weapons -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; collateral damage -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; nuclear versus conventional weapons for functionally kills -- Role of nuclear weapons in defense against ballistic missiles -- Missile defense; nuclear weapon performance -- Nuclear threat -- Biological threat -- Missile defense; collateral damage -- Missile defense; nuclear delivery options -- Comparison; the four scenario classes -- Implications for future U.S. nuclear strategy: Spectrum of nuclear strategic options -- Abolition -- Aggressive reductions and "dealerting" -- "Business as usual, only smaller" -- More aggressive nuclear posture -- Nuclear emphasis -- Some additional comments on deterrence by threat of punishment -- Maintaining a robust nuclear deterrent -- Flexible use of nuclear forces -- Characteristics of nuclear weapon systems -- Exploiting asymmetries -- Nuclear proliferation -- Is "withering away" inevitable? -- Conclusions. 
650 0 |a Strategic forces  |z United States. 
651 0 |a United States  |x Military policy. 
650 0 |a Nuclear weapons  |z United States. 
700 1 |a Buchan, Glenn C. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Air Force. 
994 |a E0  |b TXA 
948 |a cataloged  |b h  |c 2004/4/26  |d c  |e blrosas  |f 2:20:51 pm 
999 |a MARS 
999 f f |s 470d1419-9d6c-391b-9413-3369821023d4  |i c2470220-11e5-3249-9b65-59efb0b65a86  |t 0 
952 f f |p normal  |a Texas A&M University  |b College Station  |c Sterling C. Evans Library  |d Evans: Library Stacks  |t 0  |e UA23 .F883 2003  |h Library of Congress classification  |i unmediated -- volume  |m A14831154287 
998 f f |a UA23 .F883 2003  |t 0  |l Evans: Library Stacks